CASE SUMMARY (fictional)
Footwear manufacturing and product engineering, 11 years of experience. Proposed endeavor: Develop and implement a low-waste, recycled-material footwear manufacturing process for U.S.-based producers, adapting the material-substitution and process-redesign work I led in Brazil to reduce landfill-bound manufacturing waste in the domestic footwear supply chain.
AUDIT RESULT
64/ 100 — overall score
Basic eligibility: met
A bachelor's degree (Architecture) combined with 11 years of progressive experience in the specialty (footwear manufacturing/materials) satisfies the bachelor's-plus-5-years Advanced Degree Professional route, even though the degree field itself does not match.
Degree/field mismatch detected — this is not automatically disqualifying
Your background in Architecture does not directly match your project in footwear manufacturing. This does not invalidate your case, but you need to demonstrate the bridge between the two. Consider including: quantified results from the process-redesign and material-adoption work already described (dates, production volumes affected), a letter from a supervisor confirming your technical ownership of these projects, and a short explicit narrative connecting any transferable Architecture skills (materials, structural thinking, process documentation) to the manufacturing work that followed.
Recommended path: Bachelor's + 5 years of progressive specialty experience, reinforced with a nexus narrative connecting the Architecture background to materials/process work.
Prong I
Substantial Merit and National Importance
The endeavor (low-waste, recycled-material footwear manufacturing) addresses a real industry problem, but the current description does not yet quantify the national-level impact (waste volume, number of U.S. manufacturers who could adopt this, environmental or economic scale). Add concrete targets to strengthen this prong.
Prong II
Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor
Two concrete, quantified achievements (22% waste reduction, recycled-EVA adoption across three product lines) are a solid foundation. What's missing is third-party corroboration, such as a supervisor letter or a trade-show record, and a clearer narrative bridge given the Architecture degree mismatch noted above.
Prong III
Beneficial to Waive the Job Offer Requirement
No explicit argument yet for why waiving the job offer requirement serves the national interest here. Consider addressing why a single U.S. employer's labor certification process would be a poor fit for scaling this specific waste-reduction approach across the industry.
Red flags
- Proposed endeavor lacks quantified national-level impact figures (currently qualitative only).
- No third-party corroboration yet (supervisor letter, trade press, industry recognition) for the two key achievements cited.
Recommendations
- Add at least one supervisor or client letter that independently confirms the 22% waste-reduction result and your role in it.
- Quantify the addressable impact of the proposed endeavor in the U.S. market (e.g., estimated waste volume reducible per year, number of manufacturers in the target segment).
- Write a short, explicit paragraph connecting the Architecture degree to the materials/process engineering work that followed — the nexus narrative the bridge rule above calls for.
- Address directly why an employer-sponsored labor certification path would be slower or less effective than self-petitioning for this specific project.
This is a fictional example — your case is analyzed against your own information.
Real audits require a free account (email confirmation) before starting, since the triage involves sensitive personal and professional data.
Start my free EB-2 NIW screening →This is a prototype technical screening tool based on public USCIS criteria (Matter of Dhanasar). It does not replace advice from a licensed immigration attorney. The final decision belongs to USCIS. Carlos Mendes is a fictional example, not a real person.